This’n’That; July 6th; What James Comey REALLY Said!

Leave a comment

Comey Transcript Has Several ‘Revelations’
Let’s start with this basic CLINTON premise:
On both the email/server and the Clinton Crime Family Foundation scandals, both Hillary and “Slick-WillieClinton played the American public for fools, as they’ve done through-out their political lives:

As they’ve done ‘forever’ the Clintons revel under the dark cloud of scandal

[Director James Comey, FBI]  Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.

After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what we did; what we found; and what we are recommending to the Department of Justice.  This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways. First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest. Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.
[The mere fact that Director Comey felt he had to begin with the aforementioned statement would lead one to believe “Clown Princeobama~in conjunction with Loretta LynchMob~had made the decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton weeks~more likely MONTHS~ago.  Why else would the director feel it necessary to be so emphatic that neither theDepartment ofJust Us” nor barackINGHAM PALACE had any say in the process or in the resultant decision? {Such bullshit!}]
I want to start by thanking the FBI employees who did remarkable work in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have done, you will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.  So, first, what we have done:
The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that personal system.  Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.  Consistent with our counterintelligence responsibilities, we have also investigated to determine whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in connection with the personal e-mail server by any foreign power, or other hostile actors.  I have so far used the singular term, “e-mail server,” in describing the referral that began our investigation. It turns out to have been more complicated than that. Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain. As new servers and equipment were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored, and decommissioned in various ways. Piecing all of that back together — to gain as full an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal e-mail was used for government work — has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of hours of effort.
For example, when one of Secretary Clinton’s original personal servers was decommissioned in 2013, the e-mail software was removed. Doing that didn’t remove the e-mail content, but it was like removing the frame from a huge finished jigsaw puzzle and dumping the pieces on the floor. The effect was that millions of e-mail fragments end up unsorted in the server’s unused — or “slack” — space. We searched through all of it to see what was there, and what parts of the puzzle could be put back together.  FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where an e-mail was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI referred the e-mail to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of information in the e-mail, so that agency could make a determination as to whether the e-mail contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to classify the e-mail now, even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-classifying”).  From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
[The concerned American~nay, the world~public was led to believe there was but ONE CLINTON SERVER; was led to believe there was but ONE CLINTONMOBILE DEVICE‘ used by Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boytoy’s wifefor the transmitting and receiving of both private and departmental emails.  This haphazard usage of the multitude of servers and several mobile devices has/had put the national security, the international diplomatic community~as evidenced the murders of “The Benghazi Four”by Hillary Clinton~in grave danger.  
    Well over three years ago, the hacker known as “Guccifer” hacked intoMrs Clinton‘s server(s), obtaining several of her emails which were sent to hundreds of recipients, including Sid (Vicious) Blumenthal:

“Most of the e-mail recipients were sent four separate memos that were e-mailed to Clinton by Blumenthal during the past five months. Each memo dealt with assorted developments in Libya, including the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi. One memo marked “Confidential” was sent to Clinton on September 12.”

What ta’ hell is that if not ‘putting the nation at risk?!?’]

The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.  This helped us recover work-related e-mails that were not among the 30,000 produced to State. Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.
With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level. There were no additional Top Secret e-mails found. Finally, none of those we found have since been “up-classified.”  I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged from the system when devices were changed. Because she was not using a government account — or even a commercial account like Gmail — there was no archiving at all of her e-mails, so it is not surprising that we discovered e-mails that were not on Secretary Clinton’s system in 2014, when she produced the 30,000 e-mails to the State Department.  It could also be that some of the additional work-related e-mails we recovered were among those deleted as “personal” by Secretary Clinton’s lawyers when they reviewed and sorted her e-mails for production in 2014.
[HillaryThe Smartest Woman in AmericaClinton so carelessly handled her emails; her email system that she had no idea how many subject (classified/department) emails she’d received or transmitted or where~or if~they even were on her multiple servers.  Security and management was so lax it’s no wonder “Guccifer” was able to peruse the system(s) at will, seemingly without interruption.]
The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails, as we did for those available to us; instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total e-mails remaining on Secretary Clinton’s personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their search terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them, for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.  It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.  We have conducted interviews and done technical examination to attempt to understand how that sorting was done by her attorneys. Although we do not have complete visibility because we are not able to fully reconstruct the electronic record of that sorting, we believe our investigation has been sufficient to give us reasonable confidence there was no intentional misconduct in connection with that sorting effort.
And, of course, in addition to our technical work, we interviewed many people, from those involved in setting up and maintaining the various iterations of Secretary Clinton’s personal server, to staff members with whom she corresponded on e-mail, to those involved in the e-mail production to State, and finally, Secretary Clinton herself.  Last, we have done extensive work to understand what indications there might be of compromise by hostile actors in connection with the personal e-mail operation.
That’s what we have done. Now let me tell you what we found:
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).  None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government — or even with a commercial service like Gmail.
Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.  While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.  With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
[OK, Director Comey, who’s lying…. you or “Guccifer?”  He’s on record as early as March, 2013 as hacking into and disseminating classified information from Mrs Clinton’s server(s).]
So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice:
In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.  Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.  In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.  To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
[In these several final sentences, Director Comey~intentionally or unwittingly~makes a number of points:
  • “..there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information..”  Is the director saying in effect “the rule-of-law” no longer has any place in the Department ofJust Us” in not indicting Mrs Clinton?
  • “.. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent..”  The director certainly needs to refresh his legal knowledge prior to “the next BIG FIX” the “Clown Prince” blathers forth to the FBI.  I would point Mr Comey toward18 USC 793~”Gathering, Transmitting or Losing Defense Information“~in which there is NO mention of “intent!” 
  • “..this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences..”  The Director of the FBI~Mr James Comey~startlingly  confirmed a principle long held by many~if not the majority of~Americans, to wit:  There isONE SET OF RULES for the Ruling Class, another~more stringent~set of rules for the tax-paying, ‘WelfareQueen’ classesof Americans.  Essentially said rules are:
  • the upper class “can-do-no-wrong;” 
  • the lower class~”we’ll stick it in your ass-sideways ‘and break-it-off!!'”]
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.  I know there will be intense public debate in the wake of this recommendation, as there was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly, and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.  I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation—including people in government — but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because we did the investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.
That’s all I got.
Til Nex’Time….
Justin Case
*Hillary cartoon by Gary Varvel, Indianapolis Star
Reference Lie-Barry:


This’n’That; July Twenty-Fourth #1; More Straws

Leave a comment

obama Continues To “Grasp (and Gasp)!”

    For the past three-and-a-half years, “Clown Prince obama has eroded America’s respect, worldwide.  At the recent G-20 conference in Mexico City, the “Clown Prince” garnered all the respect of a confused junior partner in a law firm going down for it’s third bankruptcy!  Even the worldwide communist and muslim leaders have little respect for obamaand by extension–the United States.

   Not only has obama made a complete travesty of foreign policy, he can’t even get all his followers to attend the largest blather opportunity of his reign!  Many obamacRATics are choosing to not attend the DNC convention at the “New Black Panther Stadium in Charlotte, N.C.  Those like West Virginia’s Joe Manchin (Senator), Nick Rahall (Representative) and Earl Ray Tomblin (Governor), as well as Senators Claire McCaskell (Mo), Jon Tester (Mt) and Rep Jim Matheson (Ut).


    Of ‘grasping at straws,’ the most blatant illustration in recent weeks is the Stephanie Cutter (the Regime’s Deputy Campaign Manager) statement that Governor Mitt Romney is a felon.  This statement would be laughable if it weren’t such an outright lie!  From the Romney Campaign, the accusation deserves no defense.  Particularly in the face of obama‘s–or maybe barry soetoro‘s or maybe Bill Ayers–admission in print that obama/soetoro smoked ‘whacky-weed,’ used cocaine as well as his family’s prescription drugs.  This makes him at least a three-time felon candidate; marijuana use and possession with intent, marijuana distribution, using drugs not prescribed to him and cocaine use and distribution.  I have (with no affiliation) suggested the Romney folks to ‘make hay’ of the Stephanie Cutter statement but it would appear they chose not to.


    The most recent ‘straw’ is the re-immaculation campaign equating “Bain (Capital, LLC)” with “Bane (the archvillian of ‘Batman: The Dark Knight Rises‘)” as being dastardly, capitalistic, villianous! This, just the latest in the obama Regime‘s and campaign’s attempts to paint Governor Mitt Romney as evil and villianous.  What a sad, unfunny joke the obama campaign staff is becoming.  This latest ‘straw’ is far beneath the dignity of the presidency, IF said president had any dignity or even a modicum of presidential bearing!!


‘Splain to me again why YOU elected this Verdammte Arscholch!?!

Til Nex’Time….

This’n’That; July Eighteenth #1; Cutter ‘Opened The Dance!’

Leave a comment

obama Hatchetwoman Expanded Dialogue:

    Stephanie Cutterobama‘s chief hatchetwoman–stepped in a bucket of shit this time!!  She’s given the republicRATics an opening through her dialogue expansion that should last through election night!!  With Ms Cutter‘s false accusations that Governor Romney committed some felonious act relative to his term of employment at Bain Capital, the “felon dialogue” has now been expanded to include the multitude of felons that work for, worked for, bundled for, shilled for, the now highly vulnerable “Clown Princeobama

    Just SOME of the felons that have helped, funded, fundraised for, bundled for, advised, promoted “Clown Princeobama throughout his political life (in no particular order-they’re all crooks!):

1.  Former Ill Governor Rod Blagojevich: 14 years for political corruption.

2.  Tony Rezko: 10 years for corruption, political kickbacks.  Arranged for obama to buy a Chicago house for 25% under market value, then paid $625,000 to satisfy one of the ‘conditions of sale.’

3.  Courtney Dupree: An obama fundraiser and bundler; convicted of bank fraud, conspiracy to commit bank fraud and two false statements.

4.  Willie Shepherd: An obama fundraiser and bundler; convicted of negligent child abuse.

5.  Former NJ Governor Jon Corzine: A ‘highest level‘ obama fundraiser and bundler; “our Wall Street guy;” under FBI investigation for mishandling investors’ funds by reckless investment strategies resulting in bankruptcy.

6.  Shervin Neman: An obama fundraiser and bundler; Ponzi scheme operator, under investigation for defrauding his California Persian-Jewish community.

7.  Abake Assongba: An obama fundraiser and bundler; under investigation for defrauding a businessman ($657,000), under investigation for criminally impersonating a bank officer, consciously and vigorously avoided creditors.

8.  Alberto and Carlos Cardona: obama fundraisers and bundlers; associates of Mexican drug lords, assassins and a multitude of other Mexican fugitives.

9.  William Ayers: An obama fundraiser and secret advisor; a convicted domestic terrorist; directed, participated in or attended the NYPD Hq bombing (1970), an accidental Greenwich Village townhouse bombing (1970), the U.S. Capitol building (1971), the Pentagon (1972).

10. Bernadine Dohrn: An obama fundraiser and secret advisor; as William Ayers‘ wife, an active participant in the various acts of domestic terrorism attributed to, and admitted by Ayers.


    Now that Stephanie Cutteropened the dance,’ Governor Romney has ‘cannon fodder’ to last all through the campaign season.  Now we just need to push Romney to get as aggressive as The Bilderberg Group is.  Rather than ‘chasing the rabbits’ released from barackingham Palace, Governor Romney must settle on three or four topics and just keep hammering every day on every tv, in every state, at every gathering of ‘two or more’ supporters!!

ronald reagan billboard 450.jpg


Lest we forget, “Clown Princeobama, his own self, is a self-confessed felon, having both consumed and distributed ‘wacky-weed,’ cocaine and various perscription drugs throughout high school and college.

‘Splain to me again why YOU elected this Verdammte Arschloch!?

Til Nex’Time….

This’n’That; May Tenth #1; Felon ‘Spanks’ owe-bama!

Leave a comment

“Clown Prince” Less Popular Than Federal Felon

    No…. I’m not talking about Rahm Emanuel; not David Axelrod; not ‘General holder!!’  I’m talking about Federal Inmate #11593-051, aka Keith Judd, incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Facility in Texarkana, Texas.  Mr Judd will continue to be a “taxpayer guest” at said facility for a total of 210 months for extortion.  My question:  Is Mr Judd a former IRS employee?!?

KeithAnybody But owe-bamaJudd

    The “Clown Prince” was ‘primaried’ by Mr Judd in the in the West Virginia owe-bamacRATic presidential primary where Mr Judd carried ten counties and 41% of the turned-out voters.  This is quite a telling result given that the “Clown Prince” is the incumbent ruler; given that NO ONE had to vote; given that the owe-bamacRATics have already written West Virginia off in the upcoming general election.  An additional result of Mr Judd‘s capturing 41% of the vote is that he now can field a delegate at the owe-bamacRATic National Convention–temporarily, still in Charlotte, N.C.–because he won at least 15% of said vote.

    Neither Joe Manchinformer governor; current senator from West Virginia–nor Earl Ray Tomblinthe state’s current governor–would admit which federal felon they voted for!!

Til Nex’Time….