This’n’That; February 20th;Broken Media

Leave a comment

Broken Media… Softballs To obama; Hardballs To President Trump On Travel
Have ya seen these headlines?

  • Report: Trump on track to cost more in security than obama
  • Tourist-in-Chief: President obama Ditches Washington, D.C. To Travel All 50 States
  • michelle obama Announces Travel Plans: London And Milan
  • president obama’s Africa Trip Cost Taxpayers Nearly $6 Million
  • Report: obama Family Travel Expenses Cost Taxpayers $96 Million Over 8 Years
  • Vacationer in chief: Tens of millions spent on 38 obama holidays

President Trump has been in the Oval Office LESS THAN THIRTY-DAYS; conversely Clown Princeobama, aka barry o. soetoro, aka president obama, has been out of office LESS THAN THIRTY-DAYS and already these two are being compared as to their executive travel expenses.  The ‘Broken Media’ is~as usual~failing to compare “apples-to-apples” between Trump and obama.
For their comparisons, the ‘Broken Media’ is using President Trump‘s THREE TRIPS~count ’em:3~to his “Mar-a-Lago Resort” in Florida compared with barry o. soetoro‘s annual vacations to the home of his altered birth certificate, Hawaii:

  • The President‘s travel mileage~one way~DC to Palm Beach is 991 miles.  Three round-trips equal 5,946 miles.
  • The three~Trump~trips in this comparison were ‘working-weekends’ so they in-no-way qualify as vacation trips.
  • The Trump family members ~if they indeed accompanied the President~stayed in their personal residences while in Florida.
  • I seriously doubt The Trump Organization billed the federal government for lodging during the aforementioned three ‘working-weekends.’
  • This makes the President Trump ‘three trip package’ a total expense of $1,228,014 to the TAXPAYER.
  • mr soetoro‘s SINGLE Hawaiian vacation mileage~one-way~DC to Honolulu, Hi., is 4,835 miles.
  • One round-trip~he’s got’a get back to barackINGHAM PALACE, right~mileage is 9,670.
  • The soetoro family Hawaiian Christmas vacations average between 17 and 21 days, making the lodging expenses between $59,500 and $73,500 on the TAXPAYERS’ dime!!
  • This makes a soetoro family ‘three trip package’ a total expense of  between $25,846,489 and $25,860,489 to the TAXPAYER.

In conclusion…
at the very least the media’s comparisons of the President Trump vs barry o. soetoro trip expenses is highly suspect.  The President~thusfar~has never taken a vacation on the TAXPAYERS’ dime; while it’s difficult to find a soetoro working-weekend or a soetoro working-vacation on the TAXPAYERS’ dime or otherwise!!  One also has to bear in mind that normally when barry o. is golfing in far-away places, “michelle, ma belle,” her brood and her mother/babysitter are flitting off vacationing in a different direction, thus different planes!!
It’s not difficult to see that the ‘broken media’~with it’s “fake-news“~uses different criteria when comparing the two…
That’s all I got.
Til Nex’Time….
Justin Case
ReferenceLie-Barry:”,+FL/to/Washington,+DC,+HI/to/Washington,+DC [$206,337/flying hour]


This’n’That; July 6th; What James Comey REALLY Said!

Leave a comment

Comey Transcript Has Several ‘Revelations’
Let’s start with this basic CLINTON premise:
On both the email/server and the Clinton Crime Family Foundation scandals, both Hillary and “Slick-WillieClinton played the American public for fools, as they’ve done through-out their political lives:

As they’ve done ‘forever’ the Clintons revel under the dark cloud of scandal

[Director James Comey, FBI]  Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.

After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what we did; what we found; and what we are recommending to the Department of Justice.  This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways. First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest. Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.
[The mere fact that Director Comey felt he had to begin with the aforementioned statement would lead one to believe “Clown Princeobama~in conjunction with Loretta LynchMob~had made the decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton weeks~more likely MONTHS~ago.  Why else would the director feel it necessary to be so emphatic that neither theDepartment ofJust Us” nor barackINGHAM PALACE had any say in the process or in the resultant decision? {Such bullshit!}]
I want to start by thanking the FBI employees who did remarkable work in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have done, you will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.  So, first, what we have done:
The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that personal system.  Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.  Consistent with our counterintelligence responsibilities, we have also investigated to determine whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in connection with the personal e-mail server by any foreign power, or other hostile actors.  I have so far used the singular term, “e-mail server,” in describing the referral that began our investigation. It turns out to have been more complicated than that. Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain. As new servers and equipment were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored, and decommissioned in various ways. Piecing all of that back together — to gain as full an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal e-mail was used for government work — has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of hours of effort.
For example, when one of Secretary Clinton’s original personal servers was decommissioned in 2013, the e-mail software was removed. Doing that didn’t remove the e-mail content, but it was like removing the frame from a huge finished jigsaw puzzle and dumping the pieces on the floor. The effect was that millions of e-mail fragments end up unsorted in the server’s unused — or “slack” — space. We searched through all of it to see what was there, and what parts of the puzzle could be put back together.  FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where an e-mail was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI referred the e-mail to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of information in the e-mail, so that agency could make a determination as to whether the e-mail contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to classify the e-mail now, even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-classifying”).  From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
[The concerned American~nay, the world~public was led to believe there was but ONE CLINTON SERVER; was led to believe there was but ONE CLINTONMOBILE DEVICE‘ used by Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boytoy’s wifefor the transmitting and receiving of both private and departmental emails.  This haphazard usage of the multitude of servers and several mobile devices has/had put the national security, the international diplomatic community~as evidenced the murders of “The Benghazi Four”by Hillary Clinton~in grave danger.  
    Well over three years ago, the hacker known as “Guccifer” hacked intoMrs Clinton‘s server(s), obtaining several of her emails which were sent to hundreds of recipients, including Sid (Vicious) Blumenthal:

“Most of the e-mail recipients were sent four separate memos that were e-mailed to Clinton by Blumenthal during the past five months. Each memo dealt with assorted developments in Libya, including the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi. One memo marked “Confidential” was sent to Clinton on September 12.”

What ta’ hell is that if not ‘putting the nation at risk?!?’]

The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.  This helped us recover work-related e-mails that were not among the 30,000 produced to State. Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.
With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level. There were no additional Top Secret e-mails found. Finally, none of those we found have since been “up-classified.”  I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged from the system when devices were changed. Because she was not using a government account — or even a commercial account like Gmail — there was no archiving at all of her e-mails, so it is not surprising that we discovered e-mails that were not on Secretary Clinton’s system in 2014, when she produced the 30,000 e-mails to the State Department.  It could also be that some of the additional work-related e-mails we recovered were among those deleted as “personal” by Secretary Clinton’s lawyers when they reviewed and sorted her e-mails for production in 2014.
[HillaryThe Smartest Woman in AmericaClinton so carelessly handled her emails; her email system that she had no idea how many subject (classified/department) emails she’d received or transmitted or where~or if~they even were on her multiple servers.  Security and management was so lax it’s no wonder “Guccifer” was able to peruse the system(s) at will, seemingly without interruption.]
The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails, as we did for those available to us; instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total e-mails remaining on Secretary Clinton’s personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their search terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them, for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.  It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.  We have conducted interviews and done technical examination to attempt to understand how that sorting was done by her attorneys. Although we do not have complete visibility because we are not able to fully reconstruct the electronic record of that sorting, we believe our investigation has been sufficient to give us reasonable confidence there was no intentional misconduct in connection with that sorting effort.
And, of course, in addition to our technical work, we interviewed many people, from those involved in setting up and maintaining the various iterations of Secretary Clinton’s personal server, to staff members with whom she corresponded on e-mail, to those involved in the e-mail production to State, and finally, Secretary Clinton herself.  Last, we have done extensive work to understand what indications there might be of compromise by hostile actors in connection with the personal e-mail operation.
That’s what we have done. Now let me tell you what we found:
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).  None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government — or even with a commercial service like Gmail.
Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.  While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.  With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
[OK, Director Comey, who’s lying…. you or “Guccifer?”  He’s on record as early as March, 2013 as hacking into and disseminating classified information from Mrs Clinton’s server(s).]
So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice:
In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.  Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.  In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.  To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
[In these several final sentences, Director Comey~intentionally or unwittingly~makes a number of points:
  • “..there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information..”  Is the director saying in effect “the rule-of-law” no longer has any place in the Department ofJust Us” in not indicting Mrs Clinton?
  • “.. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent..”  The director certainly needs to refresh his legal knowledge prior to “the next BIG FIX” the “Clown Prince” blathers forth to the FBI.  I would point Mr Comey toward18 USC 793~”Gathering, Transmitting or Losing Defense Information“~in which there is NO mention of “intent!” 
  • “..this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences..”  The Director of the FBI~Mr James Comey~startlingly  confirmed a principle long held by many~if not the majority of~Americans, to wit:  There isONE SET OF RULES for the Ruling Class, another~more stringent~set of rules for the tax-paying, ‘WelfareQueen’ classesof Americans.  Essentially said rules are:
  • the upper class “can-do-no-wrong;” 
  • the lower class~”we’ll stick it in your ass-sideways ‘and break-it-off!!'”]
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.  I know there will be intense public debate in the wake of this recommendation, as there was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly, and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.  I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation—including people in government — but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because we did the investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.
That’s all I got.
Til Nex’Time….
Justin Case
*Hillary cartoon by Gary Varvel, Indianapolis Star
Reference Lie-Barry:

This ‘n’ That; Millitary; China Summit; Rochester; October 7th

Leave a comment

“This ‘n’ That” Topics For October 7th

Obama Continues NON-Support For Military
    Ya know those Marines who stand at the “Vacation-One-Alpha” helicopter’s steps; those Air Force enlisted men and officers who stand at the “Vacation-One” 747’s steps, those guys?  For all their dedication, “Clown Prince” obama has~since the start of his rule~ROYALLY f*cked them and their kind.  He expects to “draw red lines in the sand” and continue to rattle America’s sabers and to do it with an underfunded, undermanned, underequipped air, sea and land military.  How does that go along with his oath-of-rule?!?
Beat’s the shit out’a me!”
    Each~and EVERY~year of his rule, the “Clown Prince” has reduced the military budget in some form-or-fashion… missile defense, military~but not civilian~manpower, benefits for both members and families, bases, ships, nearly the entire scope of what it takes to both defend the country and to fight EVIL muslim terrorism, worldwide!
The “Excuser-in-Chief”
    I’m thinkin’ the only worse negotiator than Secretary of State John-Heinz-Forbes-Heinz-Kerry is “Clown PrinceObama, his own self!!
  • “…no matter how provocative China is, it must be, according to obama, “engaged.” It may launch a devastating cyber attack against the Office of Personnel Management costing billions of dollars, or it may send fighter aircraft to harass U.S. aircraft over international waters days before the Washington summit. It may even build airstrips on disputed islands and challenge the freedom of navigation of U.S. and other ships. No matter.”
This, from a guy(?) who gives the citizenry all kind’a shit over every aspect of liberty and freedom in American life but is ready to welcome all kind’a shit from the very rulers who continually attack us!!  Wanna know why we~meaning the Ruling Class~allow this to happen?  Here’s the lopsided reasoning:
  • “… Ben Rhodes has said U.S. ties with China represent “the most consequential bilateral relationship in the world.” This is diplomatic code for the idea that China is so big and powerful that it can do pretty much what it wants.”
China seems to be another “too-big-to-fail” entity so we have to kiss their ass.  Yet another ‘oath-of-rule’ violation which also “beats the shit out’a me!”
A Shooting-a-day…
Seemingly, that’s the assumed statistic most prevalent in Rochester [N.Y.] daily life.  Hell, we sometimes have them at a ‘three-a-day’ rate!  Wouldn’t it be far more beneficial if “The Lovely Mayor [Lovely Warren]”~instead of blathering on about ‘community involvement’~UNHANDCUFFED the Rochester Police Department to do their job of crime prevention, apprehension.  Miz Mayor… not all the local thuggery are simply “wayward lil’ chill’uns!”  Your legacy should be as a tough, just, law enforcement-guided administration but will probably be as “a blathering do-nothing” administration.
[Opinion, no published reference]
Socialist, Socialism Not Welcome!
    The folks in Roseburg, Or., ain’t too happy to find “Clown Princeobama is planning to visit their town~ostensibly~to meet with the families of the recent shooting victims.   Roseburg‘s ‘powers-that-be’ say the “Clown Prince” ain’t welcome if he plans on politicizing the gathering with his wrong-headed push for more gun control!!
Here We Go Again….
    In the wake of the latest “mass shooting” Senator Harry Reid is calling for more loss of liberty and freedom involving the Second Amendment.
Reid Picking Nose
Reid is failing to understand that ALL the federal legislation on the books WOULD NOT HAVE PREVENTED the vast majority of mass shootings in the modern era, certainly not the Umpqua CC tragedy!  It was Reid‘s party that held control of the 101st Congress, [Senate: 55% demo; House: 57.7% demo]the same one that passed the maniacal, idiotic “Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990!!
    Far more logical would be to repeal said “Gun Free…. Act” and replace it with a requirement for prospective recipients of federal school aid be CONCEAL-CARRY LICENSED!!  This would have gone much farther in prevention than all the congressional blather we’re about to hear!!
That’s all I got.
Til Nex’Time….
Justin Case
Reference “Lie-Barry:”

“Clown Prince” obama Annointed

Leave a comment

“Pinky” Reid Anoints “Clown Prince” Obama As ‘Dictator!’

SenatorPinkyReid has essentially trashed a Senate practice dating back to 1789, that of the filibuster.  While a filibuster-like tactic was first used in 1789, the first official Senate filibuster was recorded in 1837.  In 1917 the Senate adopted the ‘cloture’ as a method of ending filibusters. 


The change in filibuster rules essentially has Senator Reid giving socialist-dictatorial powers to “Clown Princeobama, the most statist, the most socialist president in United States history.  The U.S. Constitution (not that the “Clown Prince” has ever heeded it) does not enumerate the requirements for a federal judgeship nominee, i.e.,

1) no requirement for citizenship;

2) no requirement for a law license;

3) no requirement for previous experience, etc.

This means that DICTATOR obama could~and given his history~very well might nominate ‘Bomber-BillyAyers, Russian President and DICTATORIAL buddy, Vlad Putin , another avowed communist Valerie Jarrett or even ‘HanoiJaneFonda!  Remember most~if not all~federal judgeships are lifetime appointments, meaning that any and all muslim, communist, socialist, fascist, Marxist appointments DICTATOR obama makes~and the communistic Senate confirms by SIMPLE MAJORITY~will be seated on the court for the remainder of their lives!

CPo Picks Nose LIVE

Most importantly here, is the D.C. Circuit Court as well as the D.C. Court of Appeals which hear cases and appeals originating in the District of Corruption~meaning, among others~the obama Cabal.  DICTATOR obama wants to add five seats to the already UNDERworked D.C. Circuit; thus the ability to pack said court with his communist-muslim buddies!!  With such court-packing, nothing DICTATOR obama spews forth will ever be denied!!

That’s all I got.

Til Nex’Time….

Justin Case

This’n’That; September Twelfth #1; Where’s The ‘Balls?’

Leave a comment

No ‘American Balls’ Left In Egypt?!?
    During his World-Wide 2009 Apology Tour, “Clown Princeobama did everything except actually rolling-over-and-playing-dead as he traipsed around the world bowing to every third-world rathole dictator.  If they were oppressive, human rights violating tyrants, the “Clown Prince” bowed to them and expressed his appreciation for the fine job they were doing!  Once “Clown Princeobama displayed the miniscule size of his political ‘balls,’ he laid the groundwork for the displays of disrespect now shown us by the radical muslim terrorists in both Egypt and Libya!
2009 Worldwide Apology Tour;” obama bows to the king of Saudi Arabia on April 3, 2009

    After embassy attacks in the aforementioned rat-hole countries, the U.S.’ response is this statement:
“The Embassy of the United States in Cairo comdemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals (flim makers) to hurt the religious feelings of muslims–as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions.  We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right  of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.”
    Makes one kinda wonder if the same type response from The Bilderberg Regime somehow got ‘lost in the shuffle’ after one of Michael Moore‘s–as well as other socio-fascists‘–tyrannical rants against American exceptionalism;   rants against American entrepreneurialism; rants against America’s highly successful free-market capitalist system and other rants against the vast and varied American freedoms!  Largely due to the “2009 Worldwide Apology Tour” the rest of the world sees the United States as a ‘weak-kneed sissy‘ in the realm of international affairs, so one might expect this type activity to continue from the radical, activist muslim terrorists!!

Til Nex’Time….

This’n’That; September Eleventh #3; obamaconomy?

Leave a comment

Will Report Change obama’s Socio-Fascist Bent?
    I doubt it. 
‘Cuz–secondarily–it’s all about him.  He could give-a-shit about the US economy, the US’ politics, the US’ failures, so long as his subjects love him–more specifically, his wealth re-distribution–enough for re-immaculation! 
‘Cuz–PRIMARILY–it’s the method approved by The Bilderberg Group for their advancement of a one-world currency in route to a one-world government…. and–at least in this single caseobama does what Valarie Jarrett tells him!!

    The rest of the world–most specifically, those countries more competitive–recognizes America’s recent fall from the pinnacle of worldwide economic power, everyone that is, except “Clown Princeobama, the primary cause!!  In the pre-obamaconomy American history–that’s pre-2009–the United States was the NUMBER ONE MOST COMPETITIVE ECONOMY on the planet.  That’s right!  With the guidance of that evil President George W. Bush and his predecessors, the country was NUMBER ONE! 

    [As reported on the Fox Business website]  During an interview with 24/7Wall St, World Economic Forum COO-Kevin Steinberg referenced the dropping of America’s competitiveness, worldwide:

In recent years the country’s political conflicts and growing debt have become a problem.  Public confidence in elected officials has dropped following the debt ceiling in 2011 and the current struggle over the ‘fiscal cliff.’

I see this latest loss of ranking as just another in the ‘hundreds’ of reasons to send “Clown Princeobama to the figurative “dung-heapof American politics!!

‘Splain to me again why YOU elected this Verdammte Arschloch!?!
Til Nex’Time….

This’n’That; September Eleventh #1; Rememberance

1 Comment

Don’t Be A Part Of The obama “Bullshit!”
    While not falling for the Congressional or the obama ‘bullshit‘ myself, I intend to honor the concepts of rememberance and service.

As a part of my service, I intend to gin up as much local ‘voteobamaout‘ sentiment and action as I can.  I have no doubt my actions will–in part–help to make America a better place to live, work, raise a family, retire and finally to be laid to rest.

Democrat president Barack Obama bows to Japan's Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko 11-09
Clown Princeobama, The Ignoramus, bowing to the Japanese Emperor (only the Japanese bow their emperor!)

As a part of my rememberance, I intend to tell anyone who’ll listen about the ruthless, degenerate, radical muslim terrorists who intentionally murdered over three-thousand Americans on September 11, 2001.  I intend to continue my abrading of “Clown Princeobama and his Bilderberg Regime for their intentional–although subtle–attempts at sidetracking the American psyche away from the radical muslim terrorists who committed the aforementioned atrocity as well as the hundreds-of-thousands of radical muslims who secretly–as well as openly–support said actions, worldwide.

‘Splain to me again why YOU elected this Verdammte Arschloch!?!
Til Nex’Time….

Older Entries