obama Proving An Abject FAILURE!
As polling from Scott Rasmussen [ http://www.rasmussenreports.com/ ] illustrates, “Clown Prince” obama is proving that both legislative and executive experience are ‘MUST HAVES’ for the presidency.

  • The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 26% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that “Clown Prince” obama is performing his role as president. Forty-six percent (46%) Strongly Disapprove, giving obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -20.
  • The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve.
  • The “Clown Prince’s” Approval Index has been trending downward for the last year.  The last time obama was in positive territory was on 06/29/2009 when his approval rating was ONE!!  Still, only 33% strongly approved of the crap he was up to!!  

obama’s plutocratic governance simply proves that while Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” may be successful in the short term, they don’t work for the long term good of the masses!  But hey, ‘betterment of the masses’ was never the ultimate goal of either Alinsky or obama!!
[FUBO illustration compliments of www.FUBOwear.com ]

Tea Parties vs. Socialist Redistributionists
April 12, 2010
by Bob Livingston
[from: www.personalliberty.com as edited]

    Although “Clown Prince” obama, Nancy Porklosi, Harry Reid and their elite fascist foot soldiers cast it in pleasant, humanitarian terms as a means of providing healthcare to those who couldn’t otherwise afford it, the majority of Americans recognized obamaCare for what it was: a transfer of wealth to Big Pharma, trial lawyers, unions and other special interests and a power grab over society’s producers.
    Hence, the growth of the Tea Party movement across the United States.  The Tea Party took root early in 2009 in response to the massive government spending policies and takeover of two-thirds of the American automobile industry and all of the financial industry by the redistributionists—carrying both the democRAT and republicRAT labels—seeking to turn America into Karl Marx’s dream state. The Tea Party grew stronger and louder as obama—the Liar-in-Chief—denied his socialistic tendencies and looked down on them with an arrogant disdain and dismissiveness.
    Tea Partiers found their voices as 2009 turned into 2010 and the power grab reached its zenith when obama’s dream came true and the House and Senate overrode the will of the majority of Americans and passed into law obamaCare on March 21. They turned out by the thousands in Washington, D.C., that day and the day before—traveling there from all over the country on a couple of days notice—to protest, and those who couldn’t go flooded the Capitol switchboard with calls and the Capitol email servers with correspondence.
    The arrogant elitists who occupy Washington, D.C., laughed in the faces of the Tea Partiers once the passage of obamaCare was assured. Porklosi grabbed her gavel and, along with a group of her lackeys, marched boldly through the crowd of Tea Party protesters on the day the voting began, hoping above hope to incite some incident that would allow them to paint the protesters as radicals and racists.  When no one took the bait the arrogant elitists made up an incident, with one congressman saying he was slurred by a racial epithet from Tea Partiers and another claiming he was spat upon. Despite those claims, no arrests were made, no video or audio evidence of any slurs have turned up and the congressman who claims spittle flew his way was unable to make any kind of identification of a culprit. And Andrew Breitbart’s $100,000 reward to the United Negro College Fund for evidence of a slur remains unclaimed.  Capitol police escorting the group of elected elitists through the crowd of Tea Party peasants saw no evidence of anything untoward and sensed no danger for those they were charged with protecting.
    That’s because Tea Partiers aren’t violent sociopaths as the Left and liberal media would have you believe. They are ordinary, everyday Main Street Americans—49 percent Republican and 51 percent either independent or Democrat; 70 percent conservative, but 22 percent moderate; 55 percent male; and 45 percent with annual income below $50,000, 55 percent above $50,000. In age, education, employment status and race the Tea Party supporters break down statistically almost exactly like the general population, according to Gallup polls.  They’re people who would rather be at home or at work than having to stand outside their capitol building holding signs and demonstrating. They are people who, three or four years ago, would not have dreamed they would have to stand up to a government that is spending away the future of their children and grandchildren and making an unconstitutional power grab.
    And make no mistake: That’s what the elected elitists are doing. That group of Ivy League educated lawyers and political scientists that walk the halls of Congress—and one who now resides in the White House and refuses to travel sans teleprompter—has been attempting to pull a bait and switch on the American people, telling them obamaCare had nothing to do with socialism or redistribution of wealth or power over the people but only in helping the less fortunate.  Some fell for it. But, despite obama’s eloquent teleprompter and long windedness, most haven’t. Indeed, 52 percent still oppose obamaCare four weeks after its passage. But now that it has passed the elites are no longer hiding their true intent: socialist redistribution.  In their own words:

■“It’s a simple proposition to us: Everyone is entitled to adequate medical health care. If you call that a ‘redistribution of income’—well, so be it. I don’t call it that. I call it just being fair—giving the middle class taxpayers an even break that the wealthy have been getting.”—Vice President Joe Biden

■“(Health reform is) an income shift. It is a shift, a leveling, to help lower-income, middle-income Americans. … [T]he maldistribution of income in America has gone up way too much, the wealthy are getting way, way too wealthy, and the middle income class is left behind. (The new health care legislation) will have the effect of addressing that maldistribution of income in America.”—Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.)

■“I don’t worry about the Constitution on this. … What I care more about, I care more about the people dying every day that don’t have health care.”—Rep. Phil Hare (D-Ill.)

■“Let me remind you this (Americans allegedly dying because of lack of universal healthcare) has been going on for years. We are bringing it to a halt. The harsh fact of the matter is when you’re going to pass legislation that will cover 300 (million) American people in different ways it takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps that have to be taken to put the legislation together to control the people.”—Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.)

    To their credit, Republicans in Congress opposed Obamacare. It seems the GOP plans to run on a platform of “Repeal the Bill” as we head into the midterm elections this fall.

  • However, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), in typical Republican style of surrendering before the battle has been enjoined, has already lost his backbone and is saying repeal is not going to happen. The surrender came three weeks after he said Republicans would and should run on a platform of repeal.
  • Senate candidate Mark Kirk of Illinois has also backed off his repeal the bill stance.
  • Rep. Mike Castle, (R-Del.) is running for the state’s open Senate seat and he is also avoiding a pledge to repeal.
  • Expect other Republicans to follow.

     As I pointed out last week in “Don’t Pin Your Hopes On The Party Of Lincoln,” the GOP can’t be trusted to fight for smaller government. Big government is in their genes. Thankfully, Kirk and Castle have opposition.

    Remember in 1994, after a bruising fight with President Bill Clinton over universal healthcare, Republicans ran on their Contract with America which would have, in their minds, streamlined government, required a balanced budget, created jobs, set term limits and produced other reforms. Some elements did not pass in Congress and others were vetoed by Clinton and the Republicans moved on to other things, like growing government under George W. Bush.  So if you want to take back your government—take back your country—from the Obama regime and his Marxists redistributionists, don’t think you’re going to do that by selecting just any Republican candidate. He or she may be a Bob Corker, Mike Castle or Mark Kirk—maybe a socialist, maybe a progressive or maybe just a spineless, deceitful politician—with no intention of shrinking government.

    The Tea Parties will give you some idea of the worth of a candidate. But it’s up to each individual voter to check out a candidate’s record if he has one, or his words and deeds if he doesn’t, before the vote and to hold his feet to the fire after the election.  That’s the only way you’re going to be able to take your country back. The elitist redistributionists are feeling invincible, and their special interests promise generous campaign contributions when the campaign begins.

It’s your job as a voter—as a citizen—to show that your vote is more important than cash from corporatists, trial lawyers, unions and their other johns.

Til Nex’Time….